<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Dan Safford Associates</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dansaffordassociates.com/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dansaffordassociates.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2012 22:20:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
		<item>
		<title>Focus on What is Important in Your Proposal Sections</title>
		<link>http://www.dansaffordassociates.com/proposal-writing-techniques/key-sections-proposal-writting</link>
		<comments>http://www.dansaffordassociates.com/proposal-writing-techniques/key-sections-proposal-writting#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Aug 2010 18:12:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dan Safford</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Proposal Writing Techniques]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.taitco.com/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s a question I get asked often:</p>
<p>&#8220;How do I figure out what to say in my sections when there is so much I could say? Where do I begin?&#8221;</p>
<p>The technical folks usually ask it. They are faced with an RFP requirement that is pretty vague, like &#8220;Describe your approach to Mission Control Software&#8221; or, even ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s a question I get asked often:</p>
<p>&#8220;How do I figure out what to say in my sections when there is so much I could say? Where do I begin?&#8221;</p>
<p>The technical folks usually ask it. They are faced with an RFP requirement that is pretty vague, like &#8220;Describe your approach to Mission Control Software&#8221; or, even worse, &#8220;Mission Control Software&#8221; under a general heading of &#8220;System Specifications.&#8221; Furthermore, they are often given a tight page limit.</p>
<p>The problem is that the expert has a lot to say about the subject. She could go on and on about any topic in her field. And, left unchecked, she often will. The author is faced with a universe of data from which to choose as she decides what to write about. And what do you think she&#8217;ll do? She&#8217;ll likely write about that with which she is most familiar and comfortable-technical data with no real proposal focus.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s why technical sections are often so dense and irrelevant to the proposal.</p>
<p>Plus, the frustration of not knowing what to write will keep many authors from starting immediately. This is one of the biggest reasons authors procrastinate when it comes to writing the sections they have been assigned.</p>
<p>What&#8217;s the solution? It&#8217;s something you learned years ago, back in high school. Topic sentences.</p>
<p>Remember topic sentences? They appear somewhere near the top of a paragraph, announcing what the rest of the paragraph (or set of paragraphs) will be about. As your English teacher told you, the topic sentence prepares the reader for what you are about to discuss.</p>
<p>What your English teacher also told you is that the topic sentence focuses the writer&#8217;s attention on what to say in the subsequent paragraphs. This is as true in proposals as it is in any other kind of writing. In fact, topic sentences are even more important in proposals because in proposals every word you write has to be focused on addressing the customer&#8217;s needs. Get off the track, and the reader will quit reading and will miss all that you have to offer.</p>
<p>But topic sentences don&#8217;t simply arise from the authors&#8217; minds. They, too, have to be linked to something-and that&#8217;s where your strategy comes in. It&#8217;s critical that you have developed proposal themes, main messages that you want to send. It helps the authors develop topic sentences.</p>
<p>Say you have arrived at the following as one of your proposal themes:</p>
<p>&#8220;We offer the lowest risk technical solution to meet [the customer's] needs.&#8221;</p>
<p>This gives focus to the author who is responsible for preparing the section on Mission Control Software. He can develop topics (and associated topic sentences) that show how your approach to MCS offers the lowest technical risk. Having that degree of focus limits the authors&#8217; universe of potential things to say to a very manageable few things to say. This significantly reduces the potential amount of information he has to include in his section and increases the chances he&#8217;ll supply pertinent information. Plus, he&#8217;s more likely to get it in on time.</p>
<p>The lesson: Develop proposal themes and drive them down to your sections. Base your sections on the themes and you give your authors a better idea of where to start. And they&#8217;re likely to give you better input more quickly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.dansaffordassociates.com/proposal-writing-techniques/key-sections-proposal-writting/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>FOIA: One Way To Get The Edge On The Competition</title>
		<link>http://www.dansaffordassociates.com/planning-to-win/foia-proposal-research</link>
		<comments>http://www.dansaffordassociates.com/planning-to-win/foia-proposal-research#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Aug 2010 18:11:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dan Safford</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Planning to Win]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.taitco.com/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Doing business with the federal government? If you’re willing to dig, you can find a wealth of &#8220;insider&#8221; information through the Freedom Of Information Act (FOIA) process.</p>
<p>Simply put, FOIA lets individuals or companies obtain records from Federal agencies. You can use these documents to both assess upcoming opportunities and evaluate potential competitors.</p>
<p>Here are some samples ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Doing business with the federal government? If you’re willing to dig, you can find a wealth of &#8220;insider&#8221; information through the Freedom Of Information Act (FOIA) process.</p>
<p>Simply put, FOIA lets individuals or companies obtain records from Federal agencies. You can use these documents to both assess upcoming opportunities and evaluate potential competitors.</p>
<p>Here are some samples of the kinds of documents you can request to assess upcoming opportunities:</p>
<ul>
<li>Active Contract Summaries—Tells you what an agency has going on now; you can extrapolate.</li>
<li>Source Selection Plans—Shows you what a client has to do to prepare for an acquisition.</li>
<li>Strategic Plans—Identifies agency goals, objectives and even some action plans.</li>
<li>Acquisition Planning Documents—Gives a snapshot of a client’s acquisition plans.</li>
</ul>
<p>And here are sample documents you can obtain that may give insight into your competition:</p>
<ul>
<li>Past Contracts—Tells you who contracted for what work and how the contract was structured.</li>
<li>Contract Change Requests/Contract Modifications Executed—Gives you a history of contract modifications asked for by a contractor/consultant and accepted by the client.</li>
<li>Performance Reports (CPARS)—Gives information on the performance of a contractor/consultant on a given project.</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Some Limitations</strong></p>
<p>Some information is protected from release under one or more of nine specific exemptions. The exemptions are: (1) Classified Documents; (2) Personnel Rules &amp; Practices; (3) Exempted by Statute; (4) Trade Secrets/Proprietary Data; (5) Internal Deliberative Memorandum &amp; Opinions; (6) Personal Privacy; (7) Investigative Records; (8) Financial Institutions; (9) Geological/Geophysical Data.</p>
<p><strong>How To Request Information</strong></p>
<p>Here are some tips for requesting information through FOIA:</p>
<ul>
<li>Determine what you want. You need to ask for specific documents; you cannot simply ask for information. This means that you have to know what documents contain the data you want.</li>
<li>Identify which agency has the information. Don’t shotgun a request to a variety of agencies. Don’t write a &#8220;boilerplate&#8221; letter.</li>
<li>Write your request clearly and specifically. Don’t ask for a broad range of documents hoping to find some gems. The FOIA officer at a given agency is vastly overworked as it is; don’t add to his/her burden.</li>
<li>Maintain contact with the FOIA officer. Follow up your request with a phone call.</li>
<li>Be prepared to pay something. Your costs may cover processing, copying and mailing.</li>
</ul>
<p>Follow up. If you haven’t heard back in a reasonable amount of time (the law requires a response within ten working days, but many agencies are swamped with requests) call and leave a gentle reminder.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.dansaffordassociates.com/planning-to-win/foia-proposal-research/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Successful Proposal Section Checklist</title>
		<link>http://www.dansaffordassociates.com/planning-to-win/proposal-section-checklist</link>
		<comments>http://www.dansaffordassociates.com/planning-to-win/proposal-section-checklist#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Aug 2010 18:10:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dan Safford</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Planning to Win]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.taitco.com/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>A couple of years ago, a client of mine asked for a checklist for a good proposal section. Because a lot of people have asked me for one since, I figured I might as well publish it. So, here it is.</p>
<p>Note: This is a pretty generic list. It cannot address whether the content of the ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A couple of years ago, a client of mine asked for a checklist for a good proposal section. Because a lot of people have asked me for one since, I figured I might as well publish it. So, here it is.</p>
<p><strong>Note:</strong> This is a pretty generic list. It cannot address whether the content of the section is accurate. That&#8217;s up to the proposal manager, the section writer and the reviewer. But it is a good start. I will publish an article on how to kick-start proposal writing sections in upcoming newsletters.</p>
<p><strong>Responsiveness to the solicitation documents and/or specified customer requirements. Does the proposal answer the mail?</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Does the section meet all the requirements called out in the RFP (SOW, spec, etc.)?</li>
<li>Does it meet the evaluation criteria called out in the RFP?</li>
<li>Does it follow the organization required by the RFP?</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Persuasiveness of the proposal. Does the proposal make a clear case for selecting us over any other competitor?</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Does the proposal section demonstrate that we understand the customer&#8217;s problem?</li>
<li>Does the proposal section present a solution that clearly resolves that problem?</li>
<li>Does the proposal section demonstrate that we are technically competent?</li>
<li>Does the proposal section reinforce a clear theme or main message?</li>
<li>Does the proposal section cite clear benefits of the approach to the customer? Are these benefits clearly called out?</li>
<li>Does the proposal section draw a clear distinction between us and the competitors?</li>
<li>Does the proposal section make it clear why no other competitor should be selected?</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Readability of the proposal. Is the proposal easy to read and can the client find the information important to making a decision?</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Is the proposal easy to read by a non-specialist (limited use of jargon and jargon well defined)?</li>
<li>Are the sentences short (15 words avg.)?</li>
<li>Are the paragraphs short? (No more than four sentences?)</li>
<li>Is active voice used more than passive voice (We will do this work, vs. This work will be done)?</li>
<li>Have we used small words (use) rather than large words (utilize)?</li>
<li>Is there ample white space?</li>
<li>Is there a variety of graphical elements (bullets, tables, photos, drawings, call-out boxes, etc.)? Are they used in a pleasing way?</li>
<li>Is it organized well for easy scoring?</li>
<li>Is it &#8220;skimmable&#8221;, that is, easy for someone who is just skimming through it to pick out what&#8217;s important?</li>
</ul>
<p>That should do it. Feel free to edit this and customize it to your business. Having a checklist is a great way to make sure you cover all your bases and improve your proposal hit rate.</p>
<p>If you&#8217;d like more tips, strategies and examples for how you can write better proposal, I welcome you to order and download my new book: <a href="http://www.psassociates.com/publishing/winning-proposals.asp"><em><strong>How to Write Winning Proposals: An Expert Guide to Planning, Writing and Managing Proposals that Win!</strong></em></a></p>
<p>For help with your</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.dansaffordassociates.com/planning-to-win/proposal-section-checklist/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>When Writing Proposals In House Actually COSTS You Money?</title>
		<link>http://www.dansaffordassociates.com/planning-to-win/saving-money</link>
		<comments>http://www.dansaffordassociates.com/planning-to-win/saving-money#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Aug 2010 22:17:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dan Safford</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Planning to Win]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.taitco.com/?page_id=374</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Many firms claim they keep proposal costs down by preparing proposals during off hours — after work and during weekends. After all, you need to have your staff be as billable as possible, don&#8217;t you?</p>
<p>On the other hand, are you really saving money by doing this? How productive is your staff going to be on ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Many firms claim they keep proposal costs down by preparing proposals during off hours — after work and during weekends. After all, you need to have your staff be as billable as possible, don&#8217;t you?</p>
<p>On the other hand, are you really saving money by doing this? How productive is your staff going to be on a project during the day if they&#8217;re staying until eleven at night working on a proposal? And the more fatigued and worn out your staff, the more the quality of the proposal itself suffers. If you insist on doing project work during the day and proposals during &#8220;free time&#8221; and after hours, the quality of both your billable projects and the proposals will suffer.</p>
<p>The answer to this is straightforward, though it&#8217;s a tough sell: write fewer proposals, ones that come as a result of long-term pre-solicitation client contact. And when you write them, plan carefully, and draw from your marketing budget to pay for them. Over time, more of your proposals will be winners. And your staff won&#8217;t be so close to burn-out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.dansaffordassociates.com/planning-to-win/saving-money/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What’s the Most Important Thing to Know About Writing Winning Proposals?</title>
		<link>http://www.dansaffordassociates.com/planning-to-win/whats-the-most-important-thing-to-know-about-writing-winning-proposals-2</link>
		<comments>http://www.dansaffordassociates.com/planning-to-win/whats-the-most-important-thing-to-know-about-writing-winning-proposals-2#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Aug 2010 22:17:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dan Safford</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Planning to Win]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.taitco.com/?page_id=372</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The single most important element of a winning proposal is a clear set of direct benefits the customer will receive by selecting you. Nothing is more important than that. Your proposal will win or lose on that alone.</p>
<p>You must remember this crucial fact: From the customer&#8217;s perspective, most firms in a given competitive procurement are ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The single most important element of a winning proposal is a clear set of direct benefits the customer will receive by selecting you. Nothing is more important than that. Your proposal will win or lose on that alone.</p>
<p>You must remember this crucial fact: From the customer&#8217;s perspective, most firms in a given competitive procurement are technically capable of doing the job. The only way you can win is by differentiating yourself from the competition. And you do that by offering a solution that has more benefits to the customer than anyone else.</p>
<p>And here&#8217;s something else to keep in mind. What you perceive as a benefit may not be what the customer sees as a benefit. I cannot count the number of proposals I have read that cited features of an approach as if they would automatically be perceived by the customer as benefits.</p>
<p>Which brings us to a definition. What&#8217;s the difference between a feature and a benefit? A feature is an element of your solution. It&#8217;s what you will do, or what you will offer. Air conditioning in a car is a feature. But is it a benefit? Most of us would say yes. But what if we lived in Nome, Alaska? Is air conditioning still a benefit? Or is it a piece of equipment I may use once or twice a year but the rest of the time is a costly attachment that decreases my gas mileage?</p>
<p>A feature is not automatically a benefit. It is a benefit if and only if the customer values it. So, you can&#8217;t just fill your proposal with feature after feature and expect the customer to see the intrinsic value. You have to discover what the customer values, and present your features as a way to bring that value. Then it becomes a benefit. In order to discover what he values, you have to find out what his hot buttons are.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.dansaffordassociates.com/planning-to-win/whats-the-most-important-thing-to-know-about-writing-winning-proposals-2/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Proposal Writing 101: Stress Benefits, not just the Features</title>
		<link>http://www.dansaffordassociates.com/proposal-writing-techniques/proposal-benefits-features</link>
		<comments>http://www.dansaffordassociates.com/proposal-writing-techniques/proposal-benefits-features#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Aug 2010 22:16:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dan Safford</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Proposal Writing Techniques]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.taitco.com/?page_id=370</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I realize you have heard this before. I know my clients have (I say it all the time, like a broken record), but I’ll say it again:</p>
<p>Your client buys what you’re selling because she perceives it as having some benefit to her!</p>
<p>That may be obvious.  But here’s something that isn’t so obvious:</p>
<p>You need to point ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I realize you have heard this before. I know my clients have (I say it all the time, like a broken record), but I’ll say it again:</p>
<blockquote><p><em><strong>Your client buys what you’re selling because she perceives it as having some benefit to her!</strong></em></p></blockquote>
<p>That may be obvious.  But here’s something that isn’t so obvious:</p>
<blockquote><p><strong><em>You need to point out what the benefit is, even if you think it’s obvious.</em></strong></p></blockquote>
<p>Too often, proposal writers think they&#8217;re calling out benefits when what they&#8217;re really doing is simply citing the features of their offering.</p>
<p><strong>Features vs. benefits.</strong> A <em><strong>feature</strong></em> is a characteristic of your approach; it’s a part of what you are offering the customer. A feature of a refrigerator, for example, is its cold drink dispenser in the door. Now, this <em>may</em> be a benefit to some buyers, but the benefit is not intrinsic; the cold drink dispenser by itself is not a benefit.</p>
<p>A benefit is what the feature does for the client. The cold drink dispenser lets the user have cold water with very little effort on her part. She likes that, and sees how it would simplify her life; the feature makes the refrigerator more attractive to her than one without that feature. That’s the benefit of the feature. Too often, proposal writers assume the intrinsic niftiness of their technical solution is self-evident, that just citing a feature will be enough for the reader to immediately see its benefit. Not likely. It&#8217;s your job to point out the obvious, because the obvious really isn&#8217;t. How do you know what the client will consider a benefit? This is a direct result of your win- strategy brainstorming. And the benefit statements you use are the manifestations of your proposal themes.</p>
<p>Characteristics of effective benefits statements. Benefits statements vary according to what your client thinks is important. But in general they:</p>
<ul>
<li>Should be the major point of the section.</li>
<li>Must be conclusive, factual, quantified, and brief.</li>
<li>Must be stimulating; it needs to capture the readers&#8217; attention and drive them to seek proof in the text and graphics of the section.</li>
</ul>
<p>Benefits are the heart and soul of a proposal; they’re what will close the sale to the client. Citing <em>clear and direct</em> benefits to the client is also an excellent way to spike yourself above the competition. In the end, you want the client to feel she will get more value from your solution than from anyone else’s. In the end, the proposal that has the biggest benefit to the client will win.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.dansaffordassociates.com/proposal-writing-techniques/proposal-benefits-features/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How To Get The Most Out Of A Short Turn-Around Time</title>
		<link>http://www.dansaffordassociates.com/planning-to-win/proposal-plan-deadline</link>
		<comments>http://www.dansaffordassociates.com/planning-to-win/proposal-plan-deadline#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Aug 2010 22:15:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dan Safford</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Planning to Win]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.taitco.com/?page_id=368</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Here’s something we can all agree on: There’s almost always a time-crunch when it comes to writing proposals. Maybe the client doesn’t give us much lead time (two weeks; a week; three days). Or maybe the RFP sits on someone’s desk for too long before a decision is made to go for it. Whatever the ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here’s something we can all agree on: There’s almost always a time-crunch when it comes to writing proposals. Maybe the client doesn’t give us much lead time (two weeks; a week; three days). Or maybe the RFP sits on someone’s desk for too long before a decision is made to go for it. Whatever the reason, the trick is to make the most of the time we do have.</p>
<p>One way to do that is to <em>treat the proposal effort as a project</em>. This means you need to make a plan, then stick to it. Here are some things you can do:</p>
<p><strong>Prepare a proposal project schedule</strong></p>
<p>When people see a schedule, the project becomes more &#8220;real&#8221;, and it’s easier to enforce the due dates. You should include the following milestones:</p>
<ul>
<li>Drafts. You should have at least two, and three is ideal.</li>
<li>Artwork. Graphics take lots of time, and can’t be put off until the end. Set dates for drafts of the drawings, charts and photos you plan to use.</li>
<li>Reviews. You <em>need</em> to review the drafts; each time you review a draft the proposal will improve.</li>
<li>Production activities. This includes final word processing, photocopying and binding.</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Identify key people you will need for the proposal</strong></p>
<p>These will include writers, reviewers, key technical people whose expertise you will draw on. Also include any support staff you will need to put the proposal together. Finally, consider your sub-consultants; do you want them involved in the planning or writing? If so, contact them and get their commitment.</p>
<p>Figuring out early on who you want to work on the proposal increases the chances that they will be there when you need them.</p>
<p><strong>Assign responsibilities</strong></p>
<p>Who is going to do what? Make sure you 1) figure that out and 2) <em>let them know!</em></p>
<p>The key player in a proposal project is the <em>proposal manager</em>. This person (he or she should be the eventual project manager) runs the entire show. The PM should have authority to make decisions about who will serve on the proposal project.</p>
<p><strong>Hold a kick-off meeting</strong></p>
<p>A proposal is a project! Most projects have kick-off meetings to make sure everyone’s playing to the same tune. In the meeting you hand out the schedule, give proposal assignments, talk about your proposed approach. If you have a proposal strategy (and you should!) make sure everybody at the meeting knows what it is.</p>
<p>Your plan does not have to be complex. For short proposals, it means sitting down for an hour or so to figure out who needs to be involved and what the timeline will be. More complicated proposals, of course, require more planning, but it will pay off in the end.</p>
<p>If you don’t make a project plan—and stick to it—you will likely run into problems. Like key people not being there when you need them because you never checked to see if they were available. Or the drawing that isn’t ready as you’re prepping the final draft to be photocopied (&#8220;I thought <em>you</em> were going to do that.&#8221;).</p>
<p>You wouldn’t run a technical project without a plan. Your proposal projects are too important to your firm to conduct them without one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.dansaffordassociates.com/planning-to-win/proposal-plan-deadline/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Change Is In The Wind: Part Three</title>
		<link>http://www.dansaffordassociates.com/proposal-writing-techniques/proposal-evaluation-performance</link>
		<comments>http://www.dansaffordassociates.com/proposal-writing-techniques/proposal-evaluation-performance#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Aug 2010 19:37:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dan Safford</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Proposal Writing Techniques]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.taitco.com/?page_id=363</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>In a recent article we talked about how changes in the federal procurement process under the new Federal Acquisition Streamlining Act (FASA) can affect your proposal efforts, even if you don’t write proposals to the feds. We pointed out that agencies will place more emphasis on performance-based Statements of Work, and basing awards on whether the ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In a recent article we talked about how changes in the federal procurement process under the new Federal Acquisition Streamlining Act (FASA) can affect your proposal efforts, even if you don’t write proposals to the feds. We pointed out that agencies will place more emphasis on performance-based Statements of Work, and basing awards on whether the proposer offers “Best Value.” This issue we’ll talk about the changes in how evaluators will view the past performance of an offeror in making award decisions.</p>
<p>In the past, firms writing outstanding proposals have continued to win contracts, despite the fact that they may have a history of performing poorly once they have won. That’s because the evaluation process has emphasized two key elements: 1) the quality of the proposed technical approach and 2) price.</p>
<p>That’s about to change. In the new acquisition environment, federal agencies are laying more emphasis on the track record of each firm. How well they have performed on past contracts will become a significant factor for award.</p>
<p>Past performance has always been a part of the proposal process; most federal RFPs have sections requiring details of similar projects you have performed. That information, however, has not been weighted as heavily as other parts of the proposal during evaluation. The new rules allow agencies to make past performance a major factor. Look at the following examples:</p>
<ul>
<li>In test contracts, the Department of Labor rated past performance at 40-50 percent of the total evaluation score.</li>
<li>The Bureau of Prisons intends for some future contracts to rate past performance as 50 percent of the total score with technical at 25 percent and cost at 25 percent.</li>
<li>The Air Force intends to make past performance equal to scores in price, technical and management.</li>
</ul>
<p>This is a big change. It means that agencies will lay more<br />
emphasis on how well you have done similar work than on your ability to offer a solution that meets their needs. This is partly based on the the client’s understanding that you are probably just as capable of doing the work they want as everyone else who will take the time and effort to submit a proposal.</p>
<p>In this new environment, evaluators will look at the following elements of your past performance:</p>
<p><strong>The quality of products or services.</strong> How well have you complied with contract requirements? If you delivered a product, did it conform to standards of good workmanship?</p>
<p><strong>Timeliness of performance.</strong> How well did you stick to contract schedules? How responsive were you to technical direction?</p>
<p>Cost control. Did you stay at or below budget? Did you submit reasonably priced change proposals and provide current, accurate, and complete billings?</p>
<p><strong>Business practices. </strong>How well did you work with the client, including the contracting officer and technical<br />
representative(s)? Did you maintain good client relations<br />
during the contract?</p>
<p><strong>Client satisfaction. </strong>Were your clients satisfied with the work you conducted? Was the ultimate end user (the client’s client) satisfied? This is an important factor in past performance evaluation; the evaluators will make determined efforts to find this out.</p>
<p><strong>Key personnel past performance.</strong> How good are the track records of principal individuals selected to manage and perform key aspects of the work? Have they performed work similar to this? And how successful were they?</p>
<p>Evaluators will check your references more closely than they have in the past. They will ask more probing questions, and look for more details.</p>
<p><strong>What This Means To You</strong></p>
<p>Most firms will like this change. It means that your good work on past projects plays a bigger role in getting more work. But like everything, it comes with a price.</p>
<p>It means that you will not be able to simply dust off your<br />
standard past performance sections and stick them into the proposal. You will have to tailor those sections so they match each individual project you propose on. And this takes time and effort.</p>
<p>It also means that you may have to work harder on your client services skills. The more attention you pay to the client as you work on a current project, the better references you will get for future proposals. But, you should be paying attention to client services anyway, right?</p>
<p>We’ll keep you posted on other changes as they come down the pike. Stay tuned.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.dansaffordassociates.com/proposal-writing-techniques/proposal-evaluation-performance/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How do you get technical people to understand that they have to prepare proposals that sell?</title>
		<link>http://www.dansaffordassociates.com/proposal-management/how-do-you-get-technical-people-to-understand-that-they-have-to-prepare-proposals-that-sell-2</link>
		<comments>http://www.dansaffordassociates.com/proposal-management/how-do-you-get-technical-people-to-understand-that-they-have-to-prepare-proposals-that-sell-2#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Aug 2010 19:33:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dan Safford</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Proposal Management]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.taitco.com/?page_id=360</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Getting the technical people to write what I call &#8220;proposalese&#8221;-the language of proposals-is the Holy Grail that all marketing people seek. Unfortunately, there is no magic bullet here. However, I&#8217;ve found that there are some ways to help them along.</p>
<p>But first, we need to think about the technical person-the &#8220;subject matter expert&#8221;-and what drives her. ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Getting the technical people to write what I call &#8220;proposalese&#8221;-the language of proposals-is the Holy Grail that all marketing people seek. Unfortunately, there is no magic bullet here. However, I&#8217;ve found that there are some ways to help them along.</p>
<p>But first, we need to think about the technical person-the &#8220;subject matter expert&#8221;-and what drives her. I don&#8217;t want to make too many generalizations here, but I&#8217;ve found that most &#8220;technical&#8221; people have a difficult time writing &#8220;sales&#8221; documents because they firmly believe that what they are proposing-a solution to a problem-is valuable because it solves the problem. And if the problem is solved, the benefit is obvious-no more problem.</p>
<p>But, that&#8217;s not all the customer is looking for. Sure, the technical evaluator in the customer&#8217;s shop needs to see that the technical proposal writer fully understands the problem. But by also calling out the benefit of the solution, the proposal writer demonstrates that she knows what the technical evaluator thinks is valuable. The evaluator says, &#8220;Okay, they know what&#8217;s important to me.&#8221;</p>
<p>But there&#8217;s a more important consideration: the technical evaluator is not the only one evaluating the proposal. In fact, evaluation panels often include more non-technical readers than technical ones. And these people don&#8217;t often know the technology well enough to see the intrinsic benefit of the technical solution. These are the people the technical proposal writers really have to reach.</p>
<p>One way to get the technical people to focus on the sales aspect of the proposal is to hold a mini-training session at the proposal kick-off meeting. This should run no more than an hour or so, and should cover the basic principles of proposal writing. This session must include before and after examples of proposal sections-the before sections with just the features and the after sections that highlight the clear benefits along with the features.</p>
<p>Another great tool to use is what I call &#8220;section directions.&#8221; These are written by the proposal leader and give specific instructions about what details to include in the sections, and the main benefits that must be highlighted. These directions take a long time to prepare, but the time spent doing them pays off big time in the end by reducing the amount of rewriting.</p>
<p>Plus, I have found that the technical people love the section directions. We all know that the hardest part of writing is getting started. The section directions remove that major stumbling block.</p>
<p>Finally, you have to hammer at the features/ benefits connection whenever the opportunity arises. When you review the sections, write &#8220;what&#8217;s the benefit?&#8221; or &#8220;so what?&#8221; in the margin. If you talk with a writer in the hallway about her section, say, &#8220;Don&#8217;t forget benefits.&#8221; At the various proposal meetings, say, &#8220;What&#8217;s the benefit of doing it that way?&#8221;</p>
<p>The point is that the writers have to be constantly thinking benefits, benefits, benefits, and they need reinforcement.</p>
<p>As I said, there&#8217;s no magic bullet to getting the tech staff to concentrate on benefits. You just have to keep reminding them. And while they may get sick of hearing it, the proposal sections they write will be better for it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.dansaffordassociates.com/proposal-management/how-do-you-get-technical-people-to-understand-that-they-have-to-prepare-proposals-that-sell-2/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Proposal Themes: What message do you want to send?</title>
		<link>http://www.dansaffordassociates.com/proposal-writing-techniques/proposal-themes-part2</link>
		<comments>http://www.dansaffordassociates.com/proposal-writing-techniques/proposal-themes-part2#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Aug 2010 19:33:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dan Safford</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Proposal Writing Techniques]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.taitco.com/?page_id=358</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Consider these facts: A few hundred years back, in a town in Europe two families didn’t get along well. Then a boy from one family fell in love with a girl from the other family. There were a few fights between members of the family, and eventually one of the boy’s friends was killed. The ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Consider these facts: A few hundred years back, in a town in Europe two families didn’t get along well. Then a boy from one family fell in love with a girl from the other family. There were a few fights between members of the family, and eventually one of the boy’s friends was killed. The boy and the girl decided to run away, but the plan went awry and both ended up dead. The families mourned their losses.</p>
<p>Broken down to bare boned-facts, Romeo and Juliet is pretty boring. It’s how the facts are threaded together in a story, tied to an over-arching theme, that makes these facts interesting. Think about a book you have read or a movie you have seen. Now think about how you answer the question: What was it about? What was T<em>he Godfather</em> about? It was about sticking up for the family. <em>Hamlet</em> is about the consequences of indecision. You can encapsulate the theme in a single sentence, and you can point to all the individual pieces of the movie or the book and show how they reinforce the theme.</p>
<p>Every proposal should be based on a theme, an over-arching message or set of messages that find their way into every section, every graphic of your proposal. Your messages need to come out over and over again so the client cannot forget them. And your messages need to be focused not only on how you can meet the client’s needs, but why you are the best suited of all the competitors to meet those needs.</p>
<p>Proposal themes are all about coming up with a handful of strong messages that the client, when he is grilled by his boss, can point to and say, “This proposal is about saving us money,” or “This team can give us the innovative solutions we need to solve our particular problem,” or, “These guys know this project so well that if we hire anyone else we’ll waste valuable time.”</p>
<p>You wend your themes throughout the proposal, tying them to your technical story. Every “fact” you include in your proposal should be tied to one of your themes. These themes focus the reader&#8217;s attention on why you are the best choice for the job.</p>
<p>The winning proposal begins with a set of clearly defined themes (in the executive summary) then continues to hammer on those themes throughout the proposal. In fact, the ideal proposal is written around a set of themes. You address all the RFP requirements in a way that reinforces your themes.</p>
<p><strong>Characteristics of an effective theme.</strong> What makes a good theme? Apply this test to each of the strategic themes you devise. If it passes on all counts, include it in your proposal. A theme</p>
<p>·         Brings direct and perceivable value to the client.</p>
<p>·         Is provable by citing past experience, test data, testimonials, etc.</p>
<p>·         Is believable by the client. Have you addressed all the perceived weaknesses the client harbors about you?</p>
<p>·         Can be stated in a single simple sentence. (“This proposal is about _____________________”)</p>
<p>·         It is something you alone of all the competitors can offer</p>
<p>·         It is something the client believes only you can do..</p>
<p>If your themes do not meet these tests, revise them until they do. You may have to drop one as a major theme, relegating it to secondary importance, something you’ll keep, but only to bolster your case.</p>
<p>Email us at <a href="mailto:psai@psassociates,com">psai@psassociates.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.dansaffordassociates.com/proposal-writing-techniques/proposal-themes-part2/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

